Got it

Why MTU mismatch will cause the OSPF neighbor relationship down?

Created: Jun 30, 2020 01:45:58Latest reply: Jul 9, 2020 23:16:33 357 3 0 0 0
  Rewarded HiCoins: 0 (problem resolved)

Hi,

The HCIE learning video says that the MTU mismatch will cause the OSPF neighbor relationship down, just curiosity about why that happens while the MTU mismatch. Can you help to explain that?

What's more, the video says that Huawei doesn't check the MTU value by default, then, will that affect the OSPF neighbor relationship establishment?

Thanks.

Featured Answers

Recommended answer

chenhui
Admin Created Jun 30, 2020 02:50:47

Hi,
What should be pointed out firstly is that the MTU affects the adjacency relationship establishment, rather than the neighbor relationship establishment.
When two OSPF peers exchange the DBD packets, in which the MTU value will be checked. As you said, Huawei wouldn’t check the MTU value by default, so, with some specific conditions, the adjacency relationship could establish successfully, we’ll talk that later.
Back to the DBD packets exhanging. As we know, the very first DBD packets carry no LSAs, for the later DBD packets, the LSAs headers in the LSDB will be encapsulated. Suppose that the total size of the LSA headers exceed the interface MTU, it will be dropped, which will cause the router stuck in waitting for the DBD packets. As a result, the adjacency relationship wouldn’t be established successfully. On the contrary, if the MTU doesn’t exceed the interface MTU, then, the OSPF adjacency relationship might establish successfully.
View more
  • x
  • convention:

All Answers
Hi,
We've noticed about your problem, and we're processing it already.
Kindly wait a second.
Thanks.
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Hi,
What should be pointed out firstly is that the MTU affects the adjacency relationship establishment, rather than the neighbor relationship establishment.
When two OSPF peers exchange the DBD packets, in which the MTU value will be checked. As you said, Huawei wouldn’t check the MTU value by default, so, with some specific conditions, the adjacency relationship could establish successfully, we’ll talk that later.
Back to the DBD packets exhanging. As we know, the very first DBD packets carry no LSAs, for the later DBD packets, the LSAs headers in the LSDB will be encapsulated. Suppose that the total size of the LSA headers exceed the interface MTU, it will be dropped, which will cause the router stuck in waitting for the DBD packets. As a result, the adjacency relationship wouldn’t be established successfully. On the contrary, if the MTU doesn’t exceed the interface MTU, then, the OSPF adjacency relationship might establish successfully.
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Great job!
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Comment

You need to log in to comment to the post Login | Register
Comment

Notice: To protect the legitimate rights and interests of you, the community, and third parties, do not release content that may bring legal risks to all parties, including but are not limited to the following:
  • Politically sensitive content
  • Content concerning pornography, gambling, and drug abuse
  • Content that may disclose or infringe upon others ' commercial secrets, intellectual properties, including trade marks, copyrights, and patents, and personal privacy
Do not share your account and password with others. All operations performed using your account will be regarded as your own actions and all consequences arising therefrom will be borne by you. For details, see " User Agreement."

My Followers

Login and enjoy all the member benefits

Login

Block
Are you sure to block this user?
Users on your blacklist cannot comment on your post,cannot mention you, cannot send you private messages.
Reminder
Please bind your phone number to obtain invitation bonus.