This post was last edited by Bart_Oxy at 2018-12-06 10:52.
Hello, I have a issue about LSP transit for RSVP protocol on Juniper and Huawei devices.
I`d like to start a RSVP tunnel through Huawei1 --> Huawei2 --> Juniper --> Huawei3. Tunnel is not estabishing, beacuse Juniper blocks create LSP to directly connected Huawei.
Everything works when I create tunnel through Huawei1 --> Huawei2 or Huawei1 --> Juniper. Juniper MX104 works correctly as Ingress or Ergress,
but not works as a transit device.Juniper does not have any entries in the mpls.0 table (which serves as a transit table) for RSVP (LSP paths, of course, work flawlessly)
What could be wrong?What was done:1.
family mpls enabled on interfaces directly connected to others Huawei switches
2. Interfaces above added to
protocol RSVP3. Interfaces above added to
protocol mpls. I create some test tunnels (as ingress works correctly - LSP works)
4. traffic-engineering is enabled, in future I`d like to use fast-reroute.
Configuration and info about my verification:HUAWEI:
mpls
mpls te
mpls te auto-frr
mpls rsvp-te
mpls rsvp-te hello
mpls rsvp-te srefresh
mpls te cspf
interface Vlanif580
ip address IP1
pim sm
ospf cost 30
mpls
mpls mtu 9000
mpls te
mpls rsvp-te
mpls rsvp-te hello
mpls ldp
ospf 1
opaque-capability enable
area 0.0.0.0
network IP1 MASK1
netowrk IP2 MASK2
mpls-te enable
user-admin@rt01-jn-01# show protocols rsvp
traceoptions { file rsvp-log; }
interface xe-0/2/0.580;
interface xe-1/1/0.500;
interface ae1.530;
interface lo0.0;
user-admin@rt01-jn-01# show protocols mpls
ipv6-tunneling;
label-switched-path to-rt02-hw-01
{ from IP1;
to IP2;
no-cspf; }
label-switched-path to-rt02-hw-02
{ from IP3;
to IP4; }
interface xe-0/2/0.580;
interface xe-1/1/0.500;
interface ae1.530;
interface lo0.0;
1. RSVP sessions are UP - when Juniper works as Ingress
2. Neighborship with Huawei is established - my question: neighborship was established only on ip addresses of connected interfaces (on loopback interfaces there is an IDLE status) - I think it`s correct state, because on ip address of connected interfaces routers "speak" together, am I right?
RSVP neighbor: 6 learned
Address Idle Up/Dn LastChange HelloInt HelloTx/Rx MsgRcvd
Loopback-Neighbor1 1:07:38 0/0 5d 8:33:26 9 51423/0 0
Loopback-Neighbor2 1:07:38 0/0 5d 8:33:26 9 51423/0 0
Loopback-Neighbor3 1:07:38 0/0 5d 8:33:26 9 51423/0 0
IntAddr-Neighbor1 0 1/0 4d 20:03:10 9 144151/139146 21182
IntAddr-Neighbor2 0 1/0 4d 19:56:25 9 144083/139033 20998
IntAddr-Neighbor3 0 1/0 4d 19:59:07 9 144140/139108 10631
