Got it

Route distinguisher & Route target

Created: Oct 25, 2020 02:02:11Latest reply: Nov 6, 2021 06:08:46 714 8 6 0 0
  Rewarded HiCoins: 1 (problem resolved)

Hi guys,


Why Route distinguisher can't be used for the role of route target? Please provide an example. 


Featured Answers
Popeye_Wang
Admin Created Oct 26, 2020 02:00:54

Hello,
Theoretically, RTs can be used without RDs.
However, RT is not a simple number. It is usually a list. In addition, RT is a route attribute and is not placed together with the IP prefix. Therefore, it is difficult to compare RTs. Especially, the Routewithdraw message of BGP does not carry any attribute. In this case, the received route does not have the RT. As a result, two identical routes are withdrawn.

Similarly, in theory, it is possible to use only RDs without RTs.
The RD can implement the RT function, but the RD is not flexible. (When two VRFs of the same PE need to communicate with each other, only using RD cannot implement the function.)
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Herediano
Herediano Created Oct 26, 2020 02:41:04 (0) (0)
Thank you @Popeye_Wang, It's clear now  
Unicef
Unicef Created Nov 6, 2021 06:08:35 (0) (0)
 
All Answers
Hello,
It's nice to meet you in the community.
We're working on your problem. Please be patient.
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Hello,
The route-distinguisher command configures a route distinguisher (RD) for a VPN instance address family. https://support.huawei.com/hedex/hdx.do?docid=EDOC1100069307&id=route-distinguisher_vpn_instance_view&lang=en
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Herediano
Herediano Created Oct 25, 2020 16:04:11 (0) (0)
Hi @JasonHu

Please explain why it can't RD be used for the same role as RT.  
Hello,
Theoretically, RTs can be used without RDs.
However, RT is not a simple number. It is usually a list. In addition, RT is a route attribute and is not placed together with the IP prefix. Therefore, it is difficult to compare RTs. Especially, the Routewithdraw message of BGP does not carry any attribute. In this case, the received route does not have the RT. As a result, two identical routes are withdrawn.

Similarly, in theory, it is possible to use only RDs without RTs.
The RD can implement the RT function, but the RD is not flexible. (When two VRFs of the same PE need to communicate with each other, only using RD cannot implement the function.)
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Herediano
Herediano Created Oct 26, 2020 02:41:04 (0) (0)
Thank you @Popeye_Wang, It's clear now  
Unicef
Unicef Created Nov 6, 2021 06:08:35 (0) (0)
 
I have this problem too
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Good
View more
  • x
  • convention:

Comment

You need to log in to comment to the post Login | Register
Comment

Notice: To protect the legitimate rights and interests of you, the community, and third parties, do not release content that may bring legal risks to all parties, including but are not limited to the following:
  • Politically sensitive content
  • Content concerning pornography, gambling, and drug abuse
  • Content that may disclose or infringe upon others ' commercial secrets, intellectual properties, including trade marks, copyrights, and patents, and personal privacy
Do not share your account and password with others. All operations performed using your account will be regarded as your own actions and all consequences arising therefrom will be borne by you. For details, see " User Agreement."

My Followers

Login and enjoy all the member benefits

Login

Block
Are you sure to block this user?
Users on your blacklist cannot comment on your post,cannot mention you, cannot send you private messages.
Reminder
Please bind your phone number to obtain invitation bonus.