I'm using the hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum OID (1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16) to ask for the ONT number connected to the PON interfaces.
The OID is working for the MA5600 chassis and for some MA5800 chassis, but not for all of them.
After some tests I've found that MA5800 with MA5800V100R019C12 software version and working in 'distributing-mode' doesn't answer for the OID request. We receive this answer:
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID
Asking directly in the own MA5800 CLI we don't receive answer although MA5800 knows the OID:
vento-gpon2(diagnose)%%display snmp-agent mib node hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum
{ <cr>||<K> }:
Command:
display snmp-agent mib node hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum
OID : 1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16
Name : hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum
Type : column
Syntax : Integer32
Max-access : read-only
vento-gpon2(diagnose)%%display snmp-agent mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16
{ <cr>|ascii-index<K>||<K> }:
Command:
display snmp-agent mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16
vento-gpon2(diagnose)%%
If we ask for the same OID in another MA5800 chassis with MA5800V100R019C12 software but working in "profile-mode" we receive data:
(diagnose)%%display snmp-agent mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16
{ <cr>|ascii-index<K>||<K> }:
Command:
display snmp-agent mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.128.1.1.2.21.1.16
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194312192 = INTEGER: 9
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194312448 = INTEGER: 6
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194312704 = INTEGER: 7
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194312960 = INTEGER: 10
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194313216 = INTEGER: 5
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194313472 = INTEGER: 1
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194313728 = INTEGER: 3
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194313984 = INTEGER: 4
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194314240 = INTEGER: 5
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194314496 = INTEGER: 2
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194314752 = INTEGER: 0
hwGponDeviceOltControlOntNum.4194315008 = INTEGER: 4
Is there any problem with that OID request in the "distributed-mode"?
