[Knowledge sharing]Configuration example for leaking routes between two VRF's on the same switch

Solution:

In order to reproduce this scenario I used this topology(with a similar switch) to simulate :

The configuration from SW1 :
#

vlan batch 2

#

ip vpn-instance test

ipv4-family

  route-distinguisher 100:1

  import route-policy 1

  vpn-target 1:1 export-extcommunity

  vpn-target 1:1 import-extcommunity

#

ip vpn-instance test2

ipv4-family

  route-distinguisher 100:2

  export route-policy 2

  vpn-target 1:1 export-extcommunity

  vpn-target 1:1 import-extcommunity

#

interface Vlanif1

ip binding vpn-instance test

ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

#

interface Vlanif2

ip binding vpn-instance test2

ip address 2.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

#

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1

port link-type access

port default vlan 1

#

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2

port link-type access

port default vlan 2

#

bgp 1

router-id 1.1.1.1

#

ipv4-family unicast

  undo synchronization

#

ipv4-family vpn-instance test

  import-route direct

#

ipv4-family vpn-instance test2

  import-route direct

#

PC1 :

PC2:

So, using the same vpn-target for both VRFs was enough to make the ping working between these 2 hosts. Hope this is useful :)