Hello everyone:

I have a doubt about one scenario. The thing is that i want to move some traffic on a switch, and the for that i had been able is using dot1q-tunnel.

1. First of all, traffic contain some vlans, and vlans must been transparent for my configuration, i dont need to know the vlans that passes through my switch.

2. I don´t have more equipment to do that, only i have a capable switch with high performance. On the simulation i will add 3 more switches and PCs for testing.

And this is the scenario:

On LSW4: 

vlan batch 10 20

interface Eth-Trunk1
port link-type trunk
port trunk allow-pass vlan 10 20
mode lacp-static
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
eth-trunk 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
port link-type access
port default vlan 10
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3
port link-type access
port default vlan 20
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
eth-trunk 1

LSW1(MY EQUIPMENT):

vlan batch 100 200

interface Eth-Trunk1
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 100
mode lacp-static
#
interface Eth-Trunk2
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 200
mode lacp-static
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
eth-trunk 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
eth-trunk 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3
eth-trunk 2
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
eth-trunk 2
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/5
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 100
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 200

LSW5:

vlan batch 10 20

interface Eth-Trunk1
port link-type trunk
port trunk allow-pass vlan 10 20
mode lacp-static
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
eth-trunk 1
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
port link-type access
port default vlan 10
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3
port link-type access
port default vlan 20
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
eth-trunk 1

LSW2:

vlan batch 10 20

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
port link-type trunk
port trunk allow-pass vlan 10 20
#
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
port link-type trunk
port trunk allow-pass vlan 10 20

Client1: 10.10.10.1-------------vlan10

Client2: 10.10.20.1-------------vlan20

Client5: 10.10.10.10------------vlan10

Client6: 10.10.20.20------------vlan20

The problem: If the scenario is without the ether-channels, traffic travel like the red arrow, no problem, the rigth side can communicate with the left only across the switch located at the button, i can guarantee that, the simulation works nice!!!. Now, when i add one link on the tow side and configure an ether-channel, ping do not reach the destination, eg: ping from CLIENT1 to CLIENT5 reach LSW1, goes down to LSW2, then goes UP again to LSW1 by g0/0/2-g0/0/6 link AND STOP THERE. Traffic never leaves LSW1. 

Someone has tried that, please said if i am wrong with that, if eNSP is not able to do that, or if i am missing something