As shown in the preceding command output, IS-IS runs between R1 and R2, and OSPF runs between R2 and R3. Therefore, the loopback interface on R2 can be added to both OSPF and IS-IS. After the preceding configurations, R1 and R3 can learn the loopback address of R2 through the protocols.
I do not want R1 and R3 to communicate with each other. Is there any problem with the configuration?
The configuration is not affected. OSPF and IS-IS are still two separate IGP areas. R1 can communicate with R3 only after routes are imported between the two areas on R2.
The configuration is not affected. OSPF and IS-IS are still two separate IGP areas. R1 can communicate with R3 only after routes are imported between the two areas on R2.
Notice: To protect the legitimate rights and interests of you, the community, and third parties, do not release content that may bring legal risks to all parties, including but are not limited to the following:
Politically sensitive content
Content concerning pornography, gambling, and drug abuse
Content that may disclose or infringe upon others ' commercial secrets, intellectual properties, including trade marks, copyrights, and patents, and personal privacy
Do not share your account and password with others. All operations performed using your account will be regarded as your own actions and all consequences arising therefrom will be borne by you. For details, see " User Agreement."